Monday, December 31, 2007

3 DAYS 'TIL IOWA!

ON THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN:

Side note: Your Mittiot was reading his daily rag here in ol' Jacktown and it mustered a chuckle. The paper allows for "one-liners" in its op-ed section and one of the regular dems put in a quip about "knowing 2008 would be a good year." His rationale? Because it would be Bush's last year in office. Now, knowing the guy's a dem, I get the slight - BUT knowing that the dems haven't done crap-ola while holding the majority in DC, might leave one to conclude that because of GW, this country HAS NOT gone to hell in a hand basket. . . In other words, because of Bush being in the White House, 2008 WILL be a good year. Yep, this is the way I'm choosing to pass it on (though don't tell Huckabee, he might think that's an "arrogant" point of view).

What to say about Iowa? Well, Romney's going to win - which is what I've been predicting even with the 50/50 toss-up. Why? Again, the tie goes to the "organization" when it comes to caucusing. . .

Now, New Hampshire is a bit more art than science. It all depends on who gets out. Your Mittiot isn't losing sleep, however, I think the NH deal was sealed for Romney as soon as the liberal Concorde Monitor opined that Mitt "MUST BE STOPPED." Romney will win New Hampshire and fend off those late charges of desperation.

One thing that does have your Mittiot grinding his hind molars, is the familiar "run to the center" for McCain. . . He wants NH so bad, he's dropped his republican-reformation and has followed the path of milk-toast. Hey, I tell my students to "follow their heart" - if you don't like either of two parties, find another to support, BUT DON'T FAULT THE PARTY. The party is what the members want it to be - if you don't like it. . . get the heck out. Neither the Libertarian-Republican, Ron Paul, nor the Liberal-Republican, John McCain, are representing the true tenants via platform of the "Just-Republican" party.

Now, listen (or read) - Your Mittiot doesn't want to jump on the "negative bandwagon" - and I'm not. I truly do believe any of the GOP (yes, even Ron Paul) would be better then the alternative, and I'm right there come the nomination. So, what's the rant? Well, I guess the long and the short of it is that, to me, a victory is meaningless if we aren't gong to follow through on the principles that have drawn the partisans together. For your Mittiot, in other words, a "Maverick" has no business playing this team sport, and if McCain continues to follow this short-sighted path, he will, again, be stopped in the South. . . and rightfully so.

3 DAYS UNTIL VICTORY!

~ so sayeth the Mittiot.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, December 30, 2007

4 DAYS 'TIl IOWA!

ON THE ROMNEY CAMPAIGN:

Whoa Nelly! Things are heating up in Iowa - and the dems continue their same ol' sorry act.

A lot has been said of Mitt being the first in "going negative" - OH REALLY? Where have these individuals been the past six months? I've witnessed multiple times where one of the fellow GOP campaigns paid to have some guy (or girl) dressed as a dolphin wearing a "Flip Romney" shirt to attend each and every Romney event in Michigan. . . What about the GOP campaign (you know who you are - wink, wink) and the paid anti-Romney push-polling in NH and Iowa? And the list goes on. . . But let's quit fooling ourselves shall we - this is a CAMPAIGN. As Putz Matthews likes to say, "This ain't softball." And, if you think the dems are going to play nice come the general - you're an idiot. We'll need a candidate that can hit the trenches and give as good as they get (remember, H. C.'s negatives are 50%). Lastly, let's be clear - unlike some of the candidates who feel some sort of entitlement to the GOP nomination - Romney, himself, has remained positive regarding the GOP and its future - and has been sure to separate the campaign from the individual when talking about our GOP candidates.

Regarding the dems same ol', same ol', your Mittiot was watching FOX Sunday (with that little Huffican, Chris Wallace) and was pleased to note that 3 of the 4 panelists picked Romney to win Iowa. Who was the lone hold out? Go figure, Juan Williams (no relation). Biting at the bit to try and knock Romney down, refusing to acknowledge his strength in Iowa, NH, MI and SC, and being sure to through the "flip flop/Republicans hate all their candidates" rhetoric into the mix, Juan stayed true to color. . . that being "pink" of course.

Latest polls show a dead heat in Iowa. I'm stickin' with my prediction.

4 DAYS UNTIL VICTORY!

~ so sayeth the Mittiot.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

THE GOP FLORIDA DEBATE

ON THE DEBATE:

Your Mittiot will take a stab at deconstructing the debate tomorrow. But, as I know the spin will be zipping through cyberspace come morning, let me toss out the first bias twist:

WHAT THEY'RE REALLY SAYING ABOUT GOVERNOR

MITT ROMNEY AT THE ST. PETERSBURG, FL GOP DEBATE

The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder: "Romney had a strong night, seemed raring to go, seemed to be willing to take on everybody, anybody, all comers, seemed to want to pick every fight possible." (Marc Ambinder, "The Debate In Review," The Atlantic Online Blog, http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/, 11/28/07)

National Review's Seth Leibsohn: "This Is Mitt's Night." (Seth Leibsohn, "This Is Mitt's Night," National Review's The Corner, http://corner.nationalreview.com, Posted 11/28/07)

Bill Bennett: "I think that Romney stood out tonight. I think he was loud and clear. Conservative. He was 'all-in' as you'd say in Texas Hold 'Em." (CNN's Post-Debate Coverage, 11/28/07)

Bill Bennett: "I thought he came across very strong. I think you guys are absolutely right. That opening debate between Romney and Giuliani was, I think, the pivotal point of the evening. And I think points to Romney. Giuliani came across badly." (CNN's Post-Debate Coverage, 11/28/07)

ABC News Live Blog: "Romney is engaging very, very directly -- and dare I say he's getting the better of Giuliani in this exchange, funny accents and all." ("Live-Blogging During GOP Debate," ABC News' Political Radar, http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar, Posted 11/28/07)

· ABC News Live Blog: "And Romney gets the first applause by noting that illegal immigrants already broke the law." ("Live-Blogging During GOP Debate," ABC News' Political Radar, http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar, Posted 11/28/07)

National Review's Kathryn Jean Lopez: "[T]his is Romney's best debate performance yet. He reminds us he has experience and outside of Washington, he's tackled difficult issues, and does not let his temper get the best of him with a New York bully (something that will come in handy)." (Kathryn Jean Lopez, "So Far," National Review's The Corner, http://corner.nationalreview.com, Posted 11/28/07)

CNN's Bill Schneider: "A clever answer from former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney on farming. He says we need food independence like we need energy independence — keep the farmers on the farm. His reasoning: We need to be able to compete with other countries that support their farmers." (Bill Schneider, "Schneider: Romney Scores Points On Farming Answer," CNN's Political Ticker, http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com, Posted 11/28/07)

MSNBC's Domenico Montanaro: "While the sanctuary mansion line got good laughs, Romney's explanation and questions left Giuliani without an answer." (Domenico Montanaro, "Giuliani Flustered?" MSNBC's First Read, http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com, Posted 11/28/07)

National Review's Rich Lowry: "Rudy let his temper get the best of him—clear winner of the exchange: Romney." (Rich Lowry, "Mitt V. Rudy," National Review's The Corner, http://corner.nationalreview.com, Posted 11/28/07)

National Review's Seth Leibsohn: "I'd be surprised after this debate if Mitt doesn't see national numbers looking more like his Iowa or NH numbers after tonight's performance. Brilliant response to the black on black crime questions." (Seth Leibsohn, "Changing Times," National Review's The Corner, http://corner.nationalreview.com, Posted 11/28/07)

The New York Times' Katharine Q. Seelye: "But finally, a father-son team, from Atlanta, want the candidates to talk about black-on-black crime, and while Mr. Romney gets in a nice line about mothers and fathers and family values, none of the candidates really address the issue that the young son raised." (Katharine Q. Seelye, "Live-Blogging the YouTube Debate," The New York Times' The Caucus Blog, http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/, Posted 11/28/07)

National Review's Ramesh Ponnuru: "So Romney did pretty well in the debate, and won the immigration exchange." (Ramesh Ponnuru, "A Good Day for Giuliani," The Corner Blog, corner.nationalreview.com, Posted 11/28/07)

Townhall's Mary Katharine Ham: "Mitt makes a good point that homeowners should not be required to check papers of workers hired for their and connects it to regular Americans by suggesting that that's what Rudy wants them to do." (Townhall, www.townhall.com, Accessed, 11/28/07)

The Plank's Isaac Chotiner: "Romney definitely got the best of Giuliani on their early immigration skirmish (which actually got rather heated). Rudy's line about Romney's mansion was cheap and silly. And Romney is more appealing when going negative than any of the other candidates." (The New Republic's "The Plank," http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/default.aspx, Accessed, 11/28/07)

National Review's Kate O'Beirne: "Romney's reference point about how MA liberals reason is effective. Reminds us that he gets them and fought them." (National Review's "The Corner," http://corner.nationalreview.com, Accessed 11/28/07)

Captain's Quarters' Ed Morrissey: Romney and Huckabee had a good spar over giving better benefits to illegals for school than to citizens. Romney is absolutely 100% right on this issue. I hope Iowans realize that Huckabee may very well be worse than Bush on illegal immigration." (Heading Right," www.headingright.com, Accessed 11/28/07)

~ so sayeth. . . well, a lot smarter people than your Mittiot.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

MICHIGAN PRIMARY TO BE HELD

ON THE MICHIGAN "JOINT" PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY:

Alright. Alright. Your Mittiot knows when he's spittin' into the wind and must admit, begrudgingly, that it looks like the joint Michigan Primary will go - as planned - January 15th. In my humble lil' opinion, there is still a slight chance that another court battle may be brought up in terms of "who's" paying for the re-printing of ballots (explained below) now that the legislature has passed the "primary fix" putting the four dem candidates back on the ballot. However, though anything can happen - as most noted that the chances of the MI Supreme Court reversing both the initial court ruling and the appellate court ruling on the "constitutionality" of original primary legislation were very slim - it appears now all but certain the January 15th primary will go forward. Your Mittiot lost a few bets on this one, as I was certain the dems would prefer to caucus behind closed doors to choose their candidate, while enjoying the privilege of voting in the GOP primary to "help us" choose our candidate. BUT, I believe we will get a true, competitive, primary election. . . which is a good thing.

Here's the run down if your head is spinning. Both the state dems and GOP wanted to move Michigan up to have a little more prominence in the process of bumping candidates forward in the election process. This brings not only political advantages to the state, but also some economic plums. Iowa and NH, of course, wish to retain their prominence - which I can't blame them for - and applied pressure to the RNC and the DNC to reconcile the leap frogging, encroachment. On top of that - in an effort to appease the "first in the nation" states - Democrats (unwisely) promised to not campaign in Michigan (or Florida) as punishment. On top of this, four candidates (Biden, Richards, Obama, and Edwards) went as far as to file paperwork to have their names removed from the Michigan primary ballot all together - which left Clinton as the only top-tier candidate on the ballot.

earlier this month, as noted in previous blogs, a dem operative and data broker named Mark Grebner filed a lawsuit questioning the legality of the original January 15th primary legislation which gave the ballot preference data only to the dem party and the GOP. In other words, when a voter requests either a GOP ballot or a dem ballot - that recorded info would only be handed over to the respective parties.

Grebner was successful in persuading the lower court that the law was unconstitutional and the primary was off. On behalf of the SOS, the AG asked for an emergency appeal and the appellate court took a gander at the case. The MI Court of Appeals concurred with the lower court finding that the January 15th primary was, indeed, unconstitutional. An appeal was made to the state Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, legislation was already working its way through Lansing to put the four candidates back on the ballot - so a full, competitive slate of candidates appeared on the dem ballot. The legislation passed the Senate, but failed to get the necessary votes for "immediate effect" - which meant the names would be put back on the ballot (given the House concurred) but AFTER the election took place. Regardless, the vehicle was in place to legislatively address the issues noted by the court regarding the ballot preference data. However, the dems refused to take up the legislation. And this is where we sat just prior to Thanksgiving.

The Wednesday before Thanksgiving, I got email after email noting the the MI Supreme Court reviewed the case and reversed the decisions of the two lower courts. The primary was back on. . . BUT, we still have the dem names off the ballot, the need for the state party to sign off on the plan, AND, now we were getting some grumblings from the MI Clerks Association that there was not enough time to get the ballots printed and out to - among others - the military absentee voters.

On Monday, the legislation adding the four dems back to the ballot was taken up and passed - but, again, DEMOCRATS would not give the bill immediate affect. So on Monday, I was holding my bet that the primary would not go on. Among the things listed above as road bumps, I was also certain, the REPUBLICANS would not allow a defacto repeat of 2000 (dems caucus, GOP holds "open" primary - only this time, dems only have Hillary on the ballot and the GOP holds an "open" primary).

Today, I got word that the legislature has put the four candidates back on the ballot - with immediate effect - and ballots will be printed this weekend (if not sooner). The primary appears to be on. AND, thanks to a late showing by Obama in Iowa, the election could actually be competitive - meaning the dems will stay on the dem side. . .

What might derail the process? The dems may still conclude that they're going to caucus to decide whom their candidate will be (though at this point, I doubt it). Someone may file a lawsuit that stops the process again, on the grounds that the primary will disenfranchise the absentee voters. OR, the cost of reprinting ballots with the four names will become a point of contention. Possibly, one of the candidates whose name was added back on the ballot might sue, though I'm not sure why you'd want to do that - other than to get a boost in Iowa or NH (look for Obama to sniff that one). But all in all, weighing the possible outcomes, I am ready to pay my dollar to my good friend whom I bet regarding the viability of the MI January primary. . . I hate you, Steve.

And, that's where we're at. . . though - like the Michigan weather - if you don't like it, wait a minute. . . it'll change.

ON THE HUCKABEE "SURGE":

Yeah, right. . . .

~so sayeth the Mitiot.

PS. Kudos to Megyn Kelly for refusing to allow Billy O the ability to drop the very, very, poor decision of a Mass. judge at the feet of former governor Mitt Romney. That's BS Bill, and you know it.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, October 29, 2007

ROMNEY: LOOKIN' GOOD

ON ROMNEY "DOING IT THE RIGHT WAY:"

Your Mittiot just got back to his computer after a weekend of hunting wood chickens (grouse, for you non-hunting types) and closing the family shack down for the long Spartan state winter. As the primary gets close here in Mitt-chigan, your Mittiot is getting more and more antsy. When I picked up my pop to head North, I felt "good" about our campaign and the effort being put forth by - most importantly - our man Mitt, but when I got the chance today to get caught up regarding the weekend's headlines: YOUR HAPPY MITTIOT FEELS GREAT!

It started with this little gem:

Keene: Romney in Best Position for GOP Nomination NEWSMAX By: Ronald Kessler Monday, October 29, 2007 10:35 AM http://www.newsmax.com//kessler/Keene_on_Romney_Giuliani/2007/10/29/44799.html Mitt Romney is in the best position to win the Republican nomination, Dave Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union, tells Newsmax.

While Rudy Giuliani leads in the polls, Keene says most people have not begun to focus on the election. Once they do, they will recognize how liberal Giuliani is on some social issues like abortion and gay rights, and Republicans overall will tilt against him. Then Romney’s strategy of focusing on key states like Iowa and New Hampshire could propel him to the nomination, Keene says.

“Romney’s doing it the right way, in my view,” Keene says over lunch at the Palm. “My view’s colored by history, and these other guys seem to be betting that history doesn’t matter, and I’m not sure that’s true. If you win the first contest, and they’re close enough to the second contest, you get an enormous boost. And the idea that the onrush of big primaries makes those early contests unimportant may be 180 degrees wrong.”

[Full Article Here]

Had a sprinkle of this (after reading the 140th email - it would be nice if everything stopped when you went on vacay. . .):

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: GOVERNOR ROMNEY ON CNBC'S "MAD MONEY"

Governor Mitt RomneyCNBC's "Mad Money"October 26, 2007

Governor Romney On The Democrats' Massive Tax Increase Proposals:

CNBC's Jim Cramer: "One of the things that you have been noted for, you've been a great tax cutter, which has worked. Are there situations where you could see it on some vice, perhaps, or it's some way to be able to help the energy situation, that you would actually favor a tax or a higher tax than we currently have?" Governor Romney: "You know, when you open that door, you end up saying, 'Katie, bar the door.' The Democrats, like Hillary Clinton, want to put in place a new Social Security tax, they want higher income taxes, higher taxes on capital gains, dividends and interest. Charlie Rangel just came out this week saying he wants to put a surcharge on taxes, largest increase in the history of America. Look, more taxes are what the Democrats have in mind to fund many of Hillary Clinton's million good ideas. We can't afford that. It would slow down the economy. It would kill job creation in this country. The right answer is always to keep taxes down. Don't add new taxes, but instead allow the American people and the entrepreneurial spirit to grow our economy. That's the best way to get revenues for government and the best ways to get good jobs for our people." To watch Governor Romney, please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_0p6T2ui4A

Governor Romney: "We're Tired Of All The Talk, We Want To Get Somebody Who Can Get The Job Done":

Cramer: "You're running as a business president. I've seen something – I do this college tour, and I've seen something that's pretty amazing about it. The people in their 20s and their 30s in this country, now revere business, respect what business people do, and I think are inclined to want to talk openly about making money and I think would embrace a candidate like you because you've made a lot of money. Are you seeing the same thing on your campaign trail?" Governor Romney: "You know, I do think people want to have individuals who are not lifelong politicians, but folks that know how to solve tough problems. And you know, if you've been in the consulting world or the investment world, you learn how to look at a tough situation, get people to come together, analyze it, take it apart, figure out the right direction. And frankly, our country needs to have some smart people with private sector experience, business experience, to look at the problems we have here and around the world and solve them, to get the job done. We're tired of all the talk, we want to get somebody who can get the job done." To watch Governor Romney, please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJsYBgCCqCI

Cramer On Being Interviewed By Governor Romney:

Cramer: "And then there was the second man, the man I'm about to bring on, who perhaps more than any recruiter I ever met influenced me toward a new career. That man's name is Mitt Romney. He was working at Bain at the time, the top consulting company in the country. And he sat down with me, not that he would ever remember, and grilled me about what I could bring to the Bain party. He quizzed me about going around the globe fixing companies worldwide and about how I could assess companies on returns, on equity returns on investments, present value of the earnings stream, how earnings could be augmented. Synergy. I listened as he asked in his intense, eye-piercing way, rattling off questions like a Gatling gun, asked me perhaps the most difficult inquiries I've ever been grilled about. At the end of the meeting, I'd made up my mind. The guy was just too darn smart and demanding, too way ahead of me, too rigorous a businessman for Cramer! I was, in a word, intimidated!

"I'm trying to think about another time in my life that I've ever had that experience. Anyway, he made my mind up. I was going, not to Bain, but to Goldman. That's why I had no problem when I was on Chris Matthews’ show recently and called him perhaps the best businessman in the country. It was personal experience. Now, the quote's been enshrined in the businessman's ads, caused me some grief, and I must add amusement, because I didn't mean it as an endorsement for anyone for president. I just meant to tell the truth about his rigor, acumen and ability." To watch Governor Romney, please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5JZCvLGQMc

And finished with this:

Election 2008:
New Hampshire Republican Primary New Hampshire: Romney 28% Giuliani 19% McCain 16% RASMUSSEN REPORTS Friday, October 26, 2007 [SEE POLL HERE]

Mitt Romney has re-asserted his lead in the New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary. The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey shows that Romney holds a nine-point advantage over Rudy Giuliani in the Granite State. That’s up from a three-point lead in September. .

Romney is also ahead in Iowa where Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee are in a virtual tie for second. In Iowa, six-out—ten voters said they might change their mind before the caucus and vote for someone else. The current New Hampshire poll finds that roughly half of the potential voters for this first-in-the-nation primary are open to changing their mind. Giuliani is viewed favorably by 77% of Likely Primary voters, Romney by 75%. Positive reviews for McCain come from 69% while only 51% say the same about Thompson. Forty-five percent (45%) have a positive impression of Huckabee who remains an unknown to 19% of the state’s voters. Thompson has accomplished something once thought impossible—he now has higher negative ratings among Republican Primary Voters than McCain. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of those likely to vote in New Hampshire’s primary have an unfavorable opinion of the former Tennessee Senator.

WHAT A WEEKEND!

~so sayeth the Mittiot

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

SOMETHING DIFFERENT. . .

ON MITT'S BUSINESS EXPERIENCE:

I guess as your typical GOP primary voter, your Mittiot has gotten all caught up in the struggle for the Social Conservatives like most of the bloggers, etc. Your main Mittiot, here, pronounced his trust in Mitt (having met him and listened to the guy, personally, in small group settings - which, I dare say, if you do once, you'll not need to do again. . . Mitt Romney radiates optimism, confidence, and capability), and I want others to trust him, as well, as the pro-family guy he obviously is. BUT, I was reminded today while searching the web for all things Romney that Mitt's truest strength is his business experience.

When you get right down to it, government is first and foremost a business. The central government's "Mission Statement" rests atop the Constitution, as in: "We the people. . more perfect union. . . justice, domestic tranquillity, common defense, GENERAL welfare, liberty, etc, etc." In essence, there are "shareholders" (you and I), a Board of Directors (Congress), a Chief Executive (the Chief Executive), and the minions necessary (or not) to carry out the "Mission."

Ideas are certainly important, but not more important than an understanding of leadership and organizational structure and incentive and watching the bottom-line. All things absolutely necessary in the corporate world, but often found lacking in the public/political world. In short, D.C. government is the largest business of all.

Now, you may some how doubt Mitt's support for the unborn (I do not). You may some how doubt Mitt's stance regarding gay marriage (I do not). BUT, THERE IS NO DOUBTING THAT MITT ROMNEY HAS THE CORPORATE BACKGROUND NECESSARY TO RUN THE BUSINESS THAT IS GOVERNMENT. No other candidate (republican or democrat) comes close.

There was a "typical" article your Mittiot came across at the Campaigns&Elections website (I've linked to it via TeamRomney.com). Now, I say typical, because I've read the same thing many times re: Mitt at various Economic Club luncheons and Chamber get togethers. Your Mittiot has blogged about it before, in fact, and that's Mitt's absolute comfort in discussing the tenants of macro and micro economics. Formally degreed in business coupled with "real world" experience, Romney shines.

This is Romney's truest strength. And at the federal level this matters immensely - whether executing the steps necessary to protect our borders, our families, or our economy.

~ so sayeth the Mittiot

Labels: ,

Monday, October 22, 2007

CHRIS MATTHEWS IS A PUTZ

ON CATCHING HARDBALL. . .

. . . while flipping through the channels - Your Mittiot doesn't waste his time on the second class "news" channels like MSNBC. . . when sportscasters become "learned pundits" by changing the countdown from football and tennis to foreign affairs and economic policy - then the bottom of the barrel has truly been scraped. Chris Matthews, on the other hand, I've always thought a pretty descent guy (in spite of his liberal leanings). But his unabashed, single-minded, hunt to bring Mitt Romney down is beneath even the title of "newsman," and has sucked any "respect" from the soul of this lil' political science professor.

A quest for all you Mittiots and non-Mittiots alike: Find me ONE thing, ONE THING, that Chris Matthews has said positive about Romney. Show me where he has given Mitt credit for being a success by anyone's standards. Show me just an inkling of the respect that Mitt Romney has MOST DEFINATELY earned. Until your Mittiot sees the notated quote, he will - from this day forward - continue to refer to the subject at hand as "Putz Matthews." AND, referring to Mitt's "chiseled looks," doesn't count - especially when it's followed up by, "he seems fake. . ."

By the by, the part I caught was Matthews on the proverbial high horse giving Romney a dressing down about his answer to the "28% not voting for a Mormon." First, is Matthews really so stupid as to believe that many if not all those 28% are actually considering the Mormon issue, and NOT the fact that the ONLY candidate in the race who is Mormon is the REPUBLICAN, Mitt Romney. Do you think for a minute, that maybe, just maybe, this media driven "issue" is more about partisan politics and Romney getting elected than a Mormon in the Oval Office. Could that be? Is that possible, Chris, or ahhh, "Putz"?

Romney's line about 28% actually referring to Harry Reid and his being a Mormon was a good answer, that Putz fell right into. The fact that, "most Americans do not know Harry Reid is a Mormon. . ." as Putz so aptly put it, is exactly why being a Mormon is not an issue except to the Media, and Hufficrats. If being a Mormon were so high on the list of issues that voters cannot seem to get past, why is it that "NO ONE KNOWS HARRY REID IS A MORMON?" If it's so on the minds of us common folk, just how could the highest ranking Senator have "snuck" through. . . Answer us all that one.

For just a teaser, here's a fine example of Matthews in action:

JOHN MCCAIN: I'm sorry you brought it up, because I have to quickly say, what I said about the flag in South Carolina was an act of cowardice on my part.

MATTHEWS: Well, what's he doing? What's Romney doing? He has flipped on everything. Well, I don't want to put the words in my mouth [you just did, Chris.] If he's pro-choice in Massachusetts to get elected, now he's pro-life to win a national Republican referendum, what is he?

MCCAIN: I think that's for the voters to determine, but think we all run on our record. I am a proud, conservative Republican. There are other conservative Republicans in the race. I don't lay claim to the mantle. I do lay claim to the strength of my credentials and knowledge and background on national security issues which I think is the transcendent challenge of our time. Radical Islamic extremism. I'm the most prepared. I believe at least my qualifications I hope have earned me the voters' consideration.

[Complete Story Here]

NO, I'm not really going to continue to refer to Chris matthews as Putz Matthews - but the point has been made. And, the challenge is still there.

~ so sayeth the Mittiot.

Labels: , , ,

MITTIOT SPECIAL EDITION

ON DR. WILLKE'S ENDORSEMENT:

Just a quick one to, again, slam the Media who keep noting "Romney cannot get the support of Christian/Social Conservatives, blah, blah, blah. . ." well, HA! you're wrong. Now, who's got the cojones to admit it?

Dr. John Willke Endorses Mitt Romney
Monday, October 22, 2007 11:28 AM
By: Newsmax Staff
The doctor known as the founder of the pro-life movement has endorsed former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney in his bid for the Republican presidential nomination.
Dr. John Wilke, an original member of Senator Sam Brownback's Exploratory Committee, has thrown his support to Romney in the wake of Senator Brownback's withdrawal from the race.
"Unlike other candidates who only speak to the importance of confronting the major social issues of the day, Governor Romney has a record of action in defending life," Dr. Willke said. "Every decision he made as governor was on the side of life. I know he will be the strong pro-life president we need in the White House, Governor Romney is the only candidate who can lead our pro-life and pro-family conservative movement to victory in 2008."
Dr. Willke's fervent support should help erase doubts about Romney's commitment to the pro-life cause, which has been questioned due to his former position in support of abortion when he was governor of Massachusetts.

~ so "told you so" the Mittiot

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, September 23, 2007

MITT TOPS IN MICHIGAN

ON THE MACKINAC CONFERENCE: Our man Mitt, once again, shows why he's in the "poll"-position for the race to become the nominee of the GOP. Blowin' the doors of Team McCain and literally laping Giuliani and Thompson, Romney scorched the field taking 39% of the nearly 1000 SURE-TO-BE primary voters. Which, by the by, mirrors the latest Michigan polling of "likely primary voters."

Full Mackinac Straw-Poll Results: Romney 39% (383 votes); McCain 27 (260); Paul 11 (106); Giulaini 11 (104); Thompson 7 (70); Huckabee 3 (25); Hunter 1 (12); Brownback >1 (3); Tancredo 0 (0); Uncommitted 2 (16)

A good article here, or choose a related article to gather the buzz:

"Romney Wins Mackinac Poll" "In Michigan, Romney Works the House" "Romney Wins Straw Poll"

"What's your Mittiot's take?" you ask. Amazed at the level of organization of the Romney Team (of which I am a volunteer - not an employee), but not amazed at the results. As your Mittiot has said time and time and time again. . . ad nauseum - Once you hear Mitt Romney - Once you witnessed that so-called "Romney-Experience" - you cannot help but to become a Mittiot. The dems know it, the Hufficrats know it, the liberal media knows it and the other campaigns know it - and they will work tirelessly to derail Romney's campaign before Feb. 5th - because once he becomes the nominee, my fellow Mittiots, he will be the next President of the United States.

Your Mittiot had the pleasure, once again, of listening to Mitt - and he is dead on in understanding America's true needs and the role of the Central Government in fulfilling those needs. He is also dead on in calling on the GOP in DC to act a little more like the GOP of the states that the sent them there. He is dead on in reminding everybody - whether you agree with GW's positions or not - that President George Bush has restored personal integrity to the White House, which is extremely important to the American psyche in believing in the legitimacy of our leaders. Indeed, as Mr. Romney so pointedly notes, it does not serve us well to have a punch-line in the Oval Office. I could go on, but the bottom line is this: Mitt Romney will secure the GOP nomination. [read full Mackinac Conference speech below]

ON CONTINUOUSLY IGNORING SUCCESS:

Maybe it's just a bit early after the straw-poll results, but I am perplexed that with all the GOP nominees involved (or hoping to be involved) in the Mackinac Conference that FOX would not at least mention the straw-poll in its updated political news. Maybe they're "toughening" Romney up for the big dance by beating him around like gnats at the BBQ. I guess your Mittiot should be thankful, HOWEVER, it's a bit hard to believe that while Brit Hume asks the question, "Why hasn't Romney caught on" FOX continues to ignore Romney's successes and strong lead in most of the Early Primary States.

ON THOMPSON'S 7% OF THE VOTES

Kinda speaks for it self. . .

ON CHUCK YOB'S CRITICISM OF MI GOP CHAIR, SAUL ANUZIS:

Chuck, it's one thing when you support a candidate as the state's GOP National Committeeman because of what that candidate will do for our state and the nation, it's another thing to support a candidate from which your son is collecting a paycheck.

I will not say that Chuck Yob has not given a lot to the MIGOP cause (pardon the double negative) and will not second guess Mr. Yob's candidate choices in the past - but his actions regarding this presidential race must be looked at with a jaundiced eye - and the party cannot afford to be distracted by distrust. Mr. Yob has made a fine choice NOT so seek another term as Michigan's GOP National Committeeman.

ON MICHIGAN'S LEGISLATIVE FIGHT:

To my GOP brethren (and sisteren?) standing firm on fighting a tax increase from the dems and the worse governor of all time, Jennifer Granholm, keep up the good fight! Your Mittiot - your Michiganian Public College Employee - would rather have the Government "shut-down" then to give in to the baseless "need" for a tax increase. . . and my job will be directly affected (as in a loss in pay and/or benefits) if the GOP reforms are passed - BUT IN THE LONG RUN, the state I wish to raise my son in will be better for it. STAY STRONG - DO NOT RAISE TAXES! (Take a page from Mitt's book and what he was able to for Mass.)

[democrats, all together now] "Oh, but we've had five years of cuts in Michigan and it hasn't worked. . ." BS! Here are the last five years of budget EXPENDITURES (not recommendations) from the gov's office and her latest RECOMMENDATION:

http://www.michigan.gov/documents/FY07ExecutiveBudget_151966_7.pdf (page 136 - good luck trying to read it!)

2003: 39.297 Billion Dollars (an INCREASE of 22o Million Dollars over the '02 Expenditure)

2004: 39.388 Billion Dollars (an INCREASE of 91 Million Dollars)

2005: 40.334 Billion Dollars (an INCREASE of 946 Million Dollars)

2006: 41.526 Billion Dollars (an INCREASE of 1 BILLION 192 Million Dollars)

AND, for 2007 the governor has recommended a budget of 42.585 Billion Dollars, which is AN INCREASE OF 1 BILLION 59 MILLION DOLLARS.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE SHOW ME WHERE THE CUTS HAVE BEEN?

Since the gov has been in office - expenditures have gone UP nearly 2.5 Billion Dollars. And, just so you don't think that I'm turning a blind eye to the Republicans controlling the purse strings - had we put a stop to the spending early. . . GOP. . . we wouldn't facing the same 'ol, same 'ol, today.

Another little tidbit for my Michigan readers: In the last 10 years - from 1997 - 2007 (if the governor gets her recommendation) what we spend on government will have INCREASED nearly 12 BILLION DOLLARS ~ a 25% increase in the cost of government.

HOLD FIRM GOP.

~ so sayeth the Mittiot. . . and every true Republican in the State.

MITT'S SPEECH FROM MACKINAC:

“It’s good to be back home in Mackinac. One of the things I like best is that there are no cars on the island. Unfortunately, that’s Al Gore’s vision for all of America.“I spent a few great summers here – up in that big white home on the hill. We need to get a Republican family back in there again. And we need to keep a Republican family in the White House in Washington as well!

“I don’t have to tell you that my Dad made a mark on Michigan. And he made a mark on me. And I guess that is at the heart of things; he’s a big part of why I’m running for President today. In 1957, when he was the President of American Motors, he gave a speech in which he reported the following conversation:“‘My nine year old son’ – that would be me – ‘came home from school and said “Mom, we really build the best cars, don’t we?”

‘“She said, ‘Why Mitt, of course we do. Why do you ask?’“‘Well, if we build the best cars, why is it that less than three percent of the people agree with us?’“After my Dad heard of this conversation, he took me aside and said, ‘Look, Mitt, size doesn’t always indicate strength and popularity doesn’t always indicate truth, and sales volume doesn’t always indicate value.’“And then he added: ‘Right always prevails.’“Quite a Dad, teaching lessons like that to his nine year old son. Lessons I have taken to heart.

“Now, a few years older, as I have looked at the history of this nation, I have become convinced that right does indeed prevail. America has faced and overcome great challenges. These have become defining moments, inflection points, where the course of our history has changed.

“I believe that we are at an inflection point today. Forces of globalization, the emergence of new economic powerhouses like China and India, and the spread of radical violent Jihad have created a perfect storm that will change the course of our nation. And, we face unprecedented challenges in securing our borders, protecting the family, creating new jobs and achieving energy security.“The people of this great nation have always taken a hand in shaping our own destiny. I believe the American people will rise to the occasion once again, as we have always done before. But at this critical time in our nation’s history, Washington is failing us.

“I think we’d have to admit that the blame doesn’t all belong to the Democrats. We Republicans have to put our own house in order. We can’t be like Democrats – a party of big spenders. We can’t pretend our borders are secure from illegal immigration. We can’t have ethical standards that are a punch line for Jay Leno. When Republicans act like Democrats, America loses.“We’ve got to start acting like Republicans, not earmarking Republicans, not big government Republicans, but like Reagan Republicans and Teddy Roosevelt Republicans. They led us along the right course.“It’s time for us to show the confidence my Dad had that right will always prevail.“It’s time for change in Washington and change begins with us.

“Republicans for Change believe in small government. Governments should be restrained so that the freedoms and vitality of individuals and enterprises can be unleashed. Compared to free markets and free enterprises, government is slow to act, wasteful, duplicative, bureaucratic, inefficient, ineffective, and unresponsive. Have I left anything out? Other than that, government isn’t all bad. “Hillary Clinton fundamentally doesn’t trust the private sector. Of course not, she’s never worked in the private sector, except to sue people. So when she sees a problem in the marketplace, she naturally thinks more government and higher taxes are the solution. She sees the problems in healthcare, for example, and proposes more government. With her plan, patients would have to get used to hearing these words: ‘The bureaucrat will see you now.’ The right answer is less government, less regulation, more individual responsibility, and more of the market dynamics that propel the rest of our economy. This is why I predict that HillaryCare version 2.0 will meet the same fate as version one: ignominious defeat.Republicans for Change like small government.

“Republicans for Change are also fiscally responsible. We refuse to charge our children and grandchildren for our excessive spending. Even in Massachusetts facing a nearly $3 billion budget gap, the legislature and I balanced the budget every year and replenished the rainy day fund, without raising taxes and without raising our borrowing cap. Now it’s Washington’s turn to do the same. If I am elected President, I will cap non-military discretionary spending at inflation less one percent. If I get appropriations above that amount, I will veto them. And I like vetoes. I’ve vetoed hundreds of items already. Let’s put some fresh ink in the Presidential veto pen! “Here in Michigan, Governor Granholm has taken this state to the brink. By not restructuring state programs and by not shrinking government, she has precipitated a Hobbesian choice – raise taxes or shut down government. If you like what Governor Granholm has done to Michigan, you’ll love what a President Hillary Clinton would do to America. Let’s make sure America doesn’t make the same mistake Michigan made last November!

“Republicans for Change believe in strength. We know that the best foe against tyrants and the best ally peace has ever known is a strong America. We will strengthen the military with more troops, better armament, and better care for our veterans. We will also strengthen our economy with lower taxes and energy security. And we will strengthen the American family. There is no work more important to the future of America than the work that goes on within the four walls of the American home. The American family is the foundation upon which this country’s greatness has been built, but it is a foundation in need of shoring up.

“Republicans for Change know how to run a tight ship. The Katrina clean-up didn’t look like Republicans were in charge. We need to bring more accountability back to Washington. You have heard of the sub-prime credit crisis. Well, there’s a government agency that’s supposed to prevent problems like that from occurring, warning consumers, warning lenders. But they didn’t do their job. And do you know what will happen? Congress will give them more money. Do you know what should happen? Heads should roll.

“Republicans for Change have high ethical standards. I’m tired of hearing Washington officials remind us that everyone makes mistakes. Yes, but not everyone is a Congressman or a Senator or a President. They asked for this job and asked for our trust. They represent the American people. They are held up before our children. We expect higher standards of ethical conduct from Washington. We expect our elected officials to be good role models, not bad examples – thank you President Bush for restoring personal integrity and dignity to the White House. And I can guarantee you, Ann and I will do nothing that would embarrass the people of America! “Presidents lead by example. And so, if I’m elected President, one of my first acts will be to issue an Executive Order prohibiting the immediate family of my Cabinet and Senior Staff from lobbying the Executive Branch. The standard for high ethical conduct has to be set at the top.

"Republicans for Change are respectful and civil. We will work with good Democrats, Democrats who also love America, to change Washington and confront the new generation of challenges we face. The political atmosphere in Washington has become so toxic, we are in danger of weakening ourselves from within. America needs unifying leadership. I’ve found that we can find common ground with Democrats from time to time. I love what Ronald Reagan said ‘It’s not that liberals are ignorant, it’s just that what they know is wrong!’“Well, we can teach them now and then, and when we do, America wins.

“Republicans for Change aren’t afraid to tackle big problems. None is greater than the spread of radical, violent Jihadism. John Edwards says there is no War on Terror – it’s just a bumper sticker. Tell that to the people of Indonesia, Malaysia and Bali. Tell that to the people of Tanzania, Kenya and Spain. Tell that to the people of London, Washington and New York City. There is a war being waged against us by the terrorists for the future of our civilization, and if I am president, the war against the terrorists will be won!“Let’s not forget that our President has kept us safe these last six years. And it has not been easy. He fought for the Patriot Act. He listened when al-Qaeda was plotting. He interrogated terrorists. When Khalid Sheik Mohammad, the so-called mastermind of 9/11 was captured, he told his captors, ‘I’ll see you in New York with my lawyers.’ That didn’t happen. Instead, he saw GI’s and CIA interrogators at Guantanamo, and that’s just the way it ought to be!

“Republicans for Change fight to protect the family. The family is under attack. Our children need to be taught that before they have babies, they need to get married. Out-of-wedlock childbirth should once again be out of fashion.“There are different kinds of families, many doing a heroic job under difficult circumstances. The ideal setting for raising a child is and will always be where there is a mother and a father. Some liberal judges don’t see it that way. That is why it is time for a federal amendment that defines marriage as the union of a man and a Woman! “After the Columbine school shooting, Peggy Noonan wrote that our kids are swimming in an ocean of filth – pornography, sex, violence, perversion. The boys who did the shooting, she said, had drunk too deep of the polluted water. It’s time to clean up the water our kids are swimming in. I will make sure every home computer has an easy to engage filter to keep filth out of our homes. I want to enforce our obscenity laws. And for those who use the internet to find children for their perverted abuse, I say, ‘One Strike and You’re Ours!’ You’ll be facing a long prison sentence, and when you get out, a GPS tracking device for the rest of your life.

"Republicans for Change aren’t afraid to talk about faith. We recognize the hand of the Creator in the founding of our nation. We will fight to keep the words ‘under God’ in the Pledge of Allegiance. Have you seen the new dollar coin? ‘In God We Trust’ has been moved. It’s not on the face of the coin anymore, it’s on the edge – virtually invisible, just like the ACLU wants Him to be. I will go to work to get God back on the front of our coin!“I will fight to make sure our future is not defined by the letters ‘ACLU,’ but by the letters ‘USA.’

“Republicans for Change are patriotic. We love the flag. We say the pledge. We tell soldiers in the airport, ‘Thank you for your service, for your sacrifice.’ And when a Republican says ‘We support our troops,’ it comes from the heart.“Have you noticed what happens at the Olympics when someone wins the gold medal? Athletes from other countries ascend the medal stand, and they high-five and celebrate while their country’s anthem is played. But Americans place their hand on their heart and they sing the words to the Star Spangled Banner.“I don’t know where our tradition of placing our hand over our heart during the national anthem came from. I imagine that it is a sign of love – for our flag, for America, for freedom. And it is something more – our hand covers our heart to show our appreciation for the patriots who have shed their blood for our freedom.

‘O beautiful for heroes proved in liberating strife, who more than self their country loved and mercy more than life.’

“American patriotism is why I am convinced this nation will always prevail as the greatest hope of the earth.“America faces unprecedented challenges, a virtual perfect storm buffeting the pillars of our strength. The course of our history will change. And for America to remain the great nation it has always been, it will look to Republicans for leadership.

“At the beginning of my remarks, I told you about that speech my Dad gave a half-century ago. In it, he quoted Ralph Waldo Emerson, one of the great American philosophers, who said, ‘There is no weakness except from within, and the only unsurmountable barrier is our own inherent weakness of purpose.’“That was true then, and it’s true now. It’s why change must begin with us.

“Now is the time, this is the place, for Republicans to stand together – to stand for Republican principles.

“Now is the time, this is the place, for the campaign of change to move boldly forward.

“Now is the time, this is the place for Republicans to lead America in strength, in faith, in family, in what is right. For right will always prevail.

“Thank you, and God bless you.”

Labels: , ,

Thursday, May 24, 2007

ROMNEY WINS ANOTHER

ON THE COLLEGE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE STRAW POLL:
Romney Wins the CRNC Straw Poll! With a Howard Dean-like, "YEAAAOW" your fellow Mittiot clamors from his desk chair perched in front of his compooper! Primaries are won in the trenches, not in the press, not by bloggers (wait a second. . . what?) and not by hefty priced haircuts. Primaries are won in the trenches and, my dear bloggee, the trench battles are fought and won by the grassroots warriors - in other words, the all so important "college student." God love 'em, those young adults who have yet to be sullied by the political process or to find out just how much "fun" door-to-dooring, lit drops & phone banking can really be! If money is the "Mother's Milk" then college students are the 'Nilla Wafers - and it seems the Romney's pantry is gut-bustin' stocked in Milk and Cookies!
ON McCAIN TROUBLES:
A soft reminder to all those who want to put Mitt in the White House - which includes your Mittiot - campaigns ebb and flow, and in the end we're all in it for the same reason: to turn the ol' Red White & Blue, U.S. of A just a bit more RED then liberal blue. So the following isn't meant to kick a man while he's going down, nor call into question the affable capabilities of the individual. . . but, hey, why Blog if all you're going to write is Milk Toast?
So, according to Arizona Daily Star (which for all I know may be just another liberal rag - a la the Boston Globe - hell bent on unseating another Republican),
A Senior State Republican, said that ''if McCain wants to be a full-time candidate and not be at the Senate, he ought to consider resigning.'' Pearce's comments come days after McCain lashed out at fellow Republican Senator John Cornyn (R-TX), after the Texan called out McCain for being''out of line'' by choosing to ''parachute in'' at the last minute despite not sitting in on negotiations on the Senate immigration bill. At that time McCain responded by accusing Cornyn of ''making a 'chickens-t' argument'' and shouting, ''Expletive you!'' We'll wait to see how McCain responds to the fellow Arizona Republican.
NOTE TO JOHN: It might be time for you to follow the lead of Bob Dole and commit full-time - and then CALL ON HILLARY AND OBAMA to do the same! Same advise as given to Fred: It's time to poop or scoot! "Full-time" or "No-time!"
On a similar note, according to the National Journal, seems the McCain team has just lost their S.C. Campaign Director, Brad Henry. Henry's moving on to run an AG re-Election race. AG re-Election race? are things really that bad. . . most rats at least wait for the ship to take on water.
~ so sayeth Steve Sachs - not really. . . though if I know Steve. . .

Labels: , , ,